The history of art Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

The history of art - Essay Example Ancient Roman architecture consists of elements like paintings, mosaics and statues made up of concrete and cement. One chief feature of ancient Roman architecture was the construction of vault in the ceiling or roof. The vaults can be semicircular in shape (barrel vault) or elliptical (groin vault). The two most common perspectives used by the Roman artists in their works were the linear perspective and the atmospheric perspective. Another technique that was mastered by the Romans was chiaroscuro or the strong contrasts between light and dark. A very good execution of the same can be seen in the painting ‘Still Life with Peaches’. The use of a garden scape is yet another feature of Roman wall paintings. The Tomb of the Reliefs and The Tomb of the Leopards are two of the most well-known tombs of Tarquinia. Sarcophagus from Cerveteri is an Etruscan sculpture depicting a married couple together in the afterlife. The four styles of Roman painting are Masonry Style, Illusion istic Style, Ornate Style and Realistic Style. In sculpture, the equestrian statue, or the statue of a rider mounted on a horse, was very popular. An example is the Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius. The Capitoline Wolf is a bronze figure of a female wolf feeding her two infants, inspired by the myth of the founding of Rome. Such female personification is another dominant trait of erstwhile Roman sculpture. Most of the famous historic buildings and archaeological sites in Italy can be found in Colosseum and Pantheon.

High School Essay Example for Free

High School Essay â€Å"Since you started high school, how have you changed? Write to answer this question.†Ã‚  My high school years have been the most transformative years of my entire life. Although many aspects of who I am have essentially remained unchanged, some alterations in the way I behave around others and basic mentality ultimately left me with a completely new persona. Before I was in high school, I was a very sensitive person, always worried about how people perceived me and concerned with how that perception would affect me in the long run. Because of this, I conformed who I was to fit the liking of those around me, and never â€Å"let myself go,† to simply allow myself to do whatever I wanted with no obstruction or restraint. I finally realized in high school that simply being myself was far more rewarding than forcing myself to conform to the whims of those who don’t really matter. Furthermore, I realized that those who accepted me for who I was were the ones who really cared. Disliking people solely on the basis of who they are is unfair, and since I finally allowed myself to live my life without worrying about how others’ saw me, I was able to see those people who were this way. In addition, I had always been someone driven by emotion, always reacting severely to anything and thereby antagonizing those closest to me. In high school, I learned that being this way would never allow for healthy relationships, so I set myself upon fixing this issue in order to mend those relationships which I so valued. I detached myself from the outside world, placing that anger that came from my reactions into more productive things, such as writing and reading. I channeled my anger into more useful things that would have no adverse effects and because of this, was able to change my usually emotional mindset to a much more logical one – one that considered repercussions and remained cautious even in times when my  patience was most tested. Clearly, I’ve changed significantly in my general outlook on many things, even though the foundations of who I am have stayed the same. I’m eternally grateful that I was able to make some of these changes, as I’d be someone completely different today if I hadn’t, someone that I’m not sure I would like being. I’m satisfied with who I am now.

Relationship Between Inflation and Unemployment :: Economics

Inflation and unemployment are two key elements when evaluating a whole economy and it is also easy to get those figures from National Bureau of Statistics when you want to evaluate it. However, the relationship between them is a controversial topic, which has been debated by economists for decades. From some famous economists such as Paul Samuelson, Milton Freidman etc to some infamous economists, this topic received a lot of attention. However, it is this debate that makes the thinking about it evolve. In this essay, the controversial topic will be discussed by viewing different economists’ opinions on that according to time sequencing. But before started, it is worthy getting a better understanding of the terms, inflation and unemployment. Inflation refers to an increase in overall level of prices within an economy. In simple words, it means you have to pay more money to get the same amount of goods or services as you acquired before. By contrast, the term unemployment is easier to understand. Generally, it refers to those people who are available for work but do not find a work. And unemployment rate, which is the percentage of the labour force that is unemployed, is usually used to measure unemployment (Mankiw 1992). The debate of the relationship between inflation and unemployment is mainly based on the famous â€Å"Phillips Curve†. This curve was first discovered by a New Zealand born economist called Allan William Phillips. In 1958, A. W. Phillips published an article â€Å"The relationship between unemployment and the rate of change of money wages in the United Kingdom, 1861-1957†, in which he showed a negative correlation between inflation and unemployment (Phillips 1958). As shown in figure 1, when unemployment rate is low, the inflation rate tends to be high, and when unemployment is high, the inflation rate tends to be low, even to be negative. Figure 1 Phillips Curve Two years later, economists Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow, who are the most infusive representatives of Keynesian School, also published an article, showing the same negative correlation between inflation and unemployment, based on the United States’ economic data (Samuelson and Solow 1960).

Psychological Theory And Research And The Foxwood Inclusion Education Essay

â€Å" Inclusive instruction is concerned with all scholars, with a focal point on those who have traditionally been excluded from educational chances – such as scholars with particular demands disablements, kids from cultural & A ; lingual minorities, and so on ( UNESCO, 2001 ) † This is an inclusion which was set out by the guidelines for learning. With that being the instance it is difficult to grok why some students with SEN, who â€Å" attend mainstream † school, are frequently still separated from their typically developing equals. This is known as integrating and was identified to hold 3 types ; location, societal or functional- ( Warnock, 1978 ) . . It can be seen by the survey of students with SEN who attended categories in a particular unit- Sinclair Taylor ( 1995 ) . Here it was found that these pupils, even though they had SEN, were cognizant of how others around them thought about them and knew they were non like the remainder of their typically developing equals due to this separation. The classification of those with SEN is based on medical rules and factors which Belanger ( 2000 ) researched and schools frequently abide by this theoretical account prior irrespective of their consent or want. What features can be identified that are consistent with the recommendations from psychological theory & A ; research? Inclusive instruction is centred on the human right to instruction, which was asserted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948: â€Å" Everyone has the right to instruction†¦ † ( art.26 – Universal Declaration of Human Rights ) From the present article it was addressed that the really word picture of what inclusion is to each individual needs to be addressed in articles environing this subject, an as Booth and Ainscow ( 2002 ) pointed this out as being â€Å" cardinal † to inclusion but which is frequently left out, The present survey does a good occupation to turn to their conceptualization of what inclusion is early in the article. From the Education Act ( 1981 ) and the Education ( NI ) Order ( 1986 ) the authorities had been be aftering a steady patterned advance towards inclusion. This entails that all kids should hold entree to a basic but good quality education- ( Frederickson & A ; Cline, 2002. ) There is grounds that kids can do appropriate advancement in a mainstream scene if specific course of study distinction and instruction schemes are employed ( Manset & A ; Semmel, 1997 ) . In the Foxwood inclusion, this was adhered to as the single plans were developed for the demands of each kid alternatively of them seeking to suit into a stiff plan or course of study that would non function their best involvement. Pupil diverseness is something which needs to be accounted for in order for successful inclusion to happen. Wedell ( 1995 ) besides reported that stiff learning methods and regulations that merely cater for typically developing pupils may do issues for pupils with SEN. Local instruction governments ( LEAs ) are now draw a bead oning to explicate 1why a kid ‘s demands can non be met in mainstream schools if they have SEN, 2 why inclusion can non be achieved without the intervention to other kids ‘s instruction 3and why inclusion puts emphasis on resources portraying it to be complicated to supply schools with resources. Some have implied that the impression of inclusion extends further than simple integrating. It is people ‘s revised thought that has led to a re-conceptualisation of â€Å" particular demands † . If troubles had by the students are recognized, it makes advancement more likely. Communication between those involved in the kid ‘s integrating into the new school was recognised by the Foxwood inclusion programme as being imperative. Mainstream categories, predating and during the first phases of debut of students from the SEN school, were provided with a equal readying bundle. This included workshop activities which were held by an inclusion squad member and besides the category instructor. This provided the pupils with information to help their supportive interactions towards the kids with SEN. The kids with SEN wore the same uniform as the remainder of the kids in the Foxwood inclusion strategy. This brought a sense of integrity and belonging to the kid as they were visually granted the sense of adjustment in and being the same as the other pupils. This characteristic has been given more attending in the US than the UK. What farther developments could be suggested? In a survey carried out by El-Ashry ( 2009 ) the relationship and attitude of instructors towards kids with a disablement and their inclusion into mainstream schools was investigated. This showed a negative attitude from the instructors towards these kids. However, instructors that reported a relationship with one of the kids with a disablement spoke more favorably of their inclusion. This could hence be implemented in schools and reversed to happen out the attitudes of kids with SEN towards their instructors and in add-on, the instructors ‘ attitude towards them. It could give penetration into the possibility of the kid with SEN picking up on the instructors ‘ attitude towards them and their ideas on inclusion, whether it is negative or positive. Conveyance to and from school would necessitate to guarantee the obliteration of a seeable barrier implemented between mainstream and SEN. If kids with SEN are required to utilize â€Å" particular conveyance † this is a seeable separation of them from their equals e.g. â€Å" The xanthous coach. † Goodman and Burton ( 2010 ) used â€Å" Semi-structured interviews to analyze instructors ‘ experiences and attacks to including pupils with BESD in mainstream instruction † . They stated that they found this difficult â€Å" due to a deficiency of resources and degree of proficiency † . Their work showed that although the sum of work done was extended and hence a assortment of schemes for working with pupils with BESD identified, they were still concerned that instructors still raised by issues resembling those recognized in policy over 20 old ages ago. This would propose that despite the alterations that have been made ; already established obstructions to guarantee inclusion have yet to be addressed. There would necessitate to be more schoolroom helpers available to help the instructors every bit good as the pupils. Wedell ( 2000 ) really stated that for effectual inclusive instruction at that place needs to be a greater alteration than is presently acknowledge d. Educational psychologists have a cardinal function to play, nevertheless the assorted demands placed upon them raises issues as to how they can concentrate on inclusion to accomplish a coveted result every bit good as support from specializer instructors ( Takala & A ; Aunio, 2005. ) Therefore once more at that place needs to be more resources and services available in any inclusion scene, nevertheless, the Foxwood inclusion did demo grounds of this. Information and communications engineering has potential for larning among students, as has the development of equal tutoring. This could advance the sense of belonging and credence for kids with SEN every bit good as a sense of duty towards them from their equals, which in bend may turn out to decrease the extent of intimidation. Class Wide Peer Tutoring, ( CWPT ) was used to heighten the spelling public presentation and societal interactions of three typical pupils and three pupils with mild disablements in an probe by Sideridis ( 1996. ) The consequences showed a addition in the truth of spelling of all pupils, an addition of pupils ‘ continuance of positive societal interactions and eventually the satisfaction of pupils and instructors showed an addition besides. Another survey showed the same consequences, although somewhat less clear cut, with regard to kids with autism ( Ward and Ayvazo 2006, Mc Donnell et Al 2001. ) If this was incorporated it could demo success and advance coveted emotional and societal success for both the kids with SEN and their equals. In such scenarios, learning and larning becomes a collaborative activity. How might the undermentioned facets be investigated: the societal competency & A ; affectional operation of the kids with SEN, and the attitudes & A ; behavior of their schoolmates towards them? Gresham et Al ( 1997 ) described this, societal capableness, as â€Å" multidimensional concept made up of societal accomplishments, adaptative behavior and equal relationship variables. † There are multiple ways in which societal competency or ability can be investigated. A technique which could be used would be the Roster and Rating Scale. It provides the kids with a record of all those being targeted for the intent of the consequences, i.e. , their schoolmates. The numerical graduated table is explained and the kid rates each kid in conformity with this. Forced Choice Group Preference Record is besides one which can be used. Connolly ( 1983, cited by Frederickson & A ; Furnham, ) emphasized the hazards of recognizing unpopular kids, yet, Fredrickson and Furnham ( 2004 ) argue that this fact-finding method is suited for mensurating societal inclusion and besides noted that few researches supported Connolly ‘s claim as small grounds was found to reenforce it. Frederickson & A ; Graham ( 1999 ) reported dependability and cogency with respects to the information which the method produced. The present survey investigated some of these facets by analyzing the relationship between strong-arming and exploitation between kids with SEN and their equals. In a reappraisal by Gresham ( 1997 ) it was concluded that kids with mild disablements had poorer societal accomplishments and besides displayed more clogging job behaviors. They were unsuccessfully accepted or discarded by equals. However, it is Important that the instruction proviso giv es extra attending to warrant that kids who have SEN are non subjected to severe societal rejection since they lack expertness in cardinal societal and emotional countries. Dodge et Al ( 1982 ) illustrated that kids with SEN experienced troubles in certain societal state of affairss as they found it hard to construe these state of affairss in the manner that their equals could. The â€Å" Guess who † societal behavior, bully and victim steps developed by Frederickson & A ; Graham ( 1999 ) was used in the Foxwood inclusion strategy and is utile for the indicant of the pupils sentiments to give an penetration into the attitudes towards the kids with SEN. Some worried that if kids with SEN were incorporated into a schoolroom or school with typically developing kids, that the typically underdeveloped kids would be disrupted. However research by Kalmabouka et Al ( 2007 ) found there to be no unfavorable effects for the first initial pupils when SEN kids were included in the school. In the Foxwood inclusion article, it was reported that Trends in equal studies of strong-arming suggest that there is no room for complacence and that ongoing monitoring is required. Humphrey ( 2008 ) worryingly admitted that after their research for including kids with SEN among their equals that â€Å" none of the schemes outlined here or elsewhere are likely to be successful unless they are underpinned by nucleus values and attitudes that include regard for ( and jubilation of ) diverseness. † Decision of inclusion The current Foxwood inclusion strategy made usage of bing research and schemes, every bit good as guidelines for successful inclusion. The students were good supported and accepted contrary to Warnock ‘s ( 2005 ) uncertainnesss. The equal readying bundle may be responsible for the differences among the consequences of credence. They admitted more research would be insightful. In order for the concerns of intimidation and credence within the schoolroom, the literature could be farther examined to set into topographic point any suggested which may farther better the state of affairs. Combined work on inclusion along with the hereafter developments discussed supra could hopefully retroflex the consequences shown by the Foxwood strategy except on a more cosmopolitan graduated table. The inclusion of a kid would normally come about by the petitions of the parent or the kid ; therefore it is the figures in the educational system, pupils and parents etc to guarantee the kid ‘s e xperience is worthwhile.

Legalization of Euthanasia

People have the right to medical care, but pain and suffering for a person has to be one of the toughest things in life to deal with. In the health care world, few topics create a debate as heated as euthanasia. Euthanasia comes from the Greek word meaning good death. Euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the suspension of medical treatment. In this essay, I will discuss the benefits and negatives in legalizing euthanasia.Although legalizing euthanasia would help alleviate suffering in terminally ill patients, the act of intentionally killing an individual devalues human life causing a distrust in physicians and may even become a means of health care cost containment, empowering law abusers. Firstly, i'll discuss the benefit in legalizing euthanasia, for it is a good way of ultimately relieving extreme pain when a persons quality of life is low. The biggest argument in favor of euthanasia is that the person involved is in great pain.L egalizing euthanasia would help alleviate suffering of terminally ill patients. It would be inhuman and unfair to make them endure the unbearable pain. In case of individuals suffering from incurable diseases or in conditions where effective treatment wouldn’t affect their quality of life; they should be given the liberty to choose induced death. Also, the motive of euthanasia is to â€Å"aid-in-dying† painlessly and thus should be considered and accepted by law. Although killing in an attempt to defend oneself is far different from mercy killing, law does find it worth approving.In an attempt to provide medical and emotional care to the patient, a doctor does and should prescribe medicines that will relieve his suffering even if the medications cause gross side effects. This means that dealing with agony and distress should be the priority even if it affects the life expectancy. Euthanasia follows the same theory of dealing with torment in a way to help one die peacef ully out of the compromising situation. Euthanasia should be a natural extension of patients’ rights allowing him to decide the value of life and death for him.Maintaining life support systems against patients’ wish is considered unethical by law as well as medical philosophy. If the patient has the right to discontinue treatment why would he not have the right to shorten his lifetime to escape the intolerable anguish? Isn’t the pain of waiting for death frightening and traumatic? Faye Girsh, at the Final Exit Network says, â€Å"At the Hemlock Society we get calls daily from desperate people who are looking for someone like Jack Kevorkian to end their lives which have lost all quality†¦Americans should enjoy a right guaranteed in the European Declaration of Human Rights — the right not to be forced to suffer. It should be considered as much of a crime to make someone live who with justification does not wish to continue as it is to take life withou t consent. † That point being made, the act of intentionally taking the life of an individual also devalues human life which may cause a distrust in physicians and ultimately makes this form of pain alleviation a bad idea. Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life.People who support euthanasia often say that it is already considered permissable to take human life under some circumstances such as self defense – but they miss the point that when one kills for self defense they are saving innocent life – either their own or someone else's. With euthanasia no one's life is being saved, rather life is only taken. History has taught us the dangers of euthanasia and that is why there are only two countries in the world today where it is legal. That is why almost all societies, even non-religious ones, for thousands of years have made euthanasia a crime.There are also two topics to discuss here: the definition of â€Å"terminal† and the c hanges that have already taken place to extend euthanasia to those who aren't â€Å"terminally ill. † There are many definitions for the word â€Å"terminal. † For example, when he spoke to the National Press Club in 1992, Jack Kevorkian said that a terminal illness was â€Å"any disease that curtails life even for a day. † The co-founder of the Hemlock Society often refers to â€Å"terminal old age. † Some laws define â€Å"terminal† condition as one from which death will occur in a â€Å"relatively short time. Others state that â€Å"terminal† means that death is expected within six months or less. Even where a specific life expectancy is referred to, medical experts acknowledge that it is virtually impossible to predict the life expectancy of a particular patient.Some people diagnosed as terminally ill don't die for years, if at all, from the diagnosed condition. Increasingly, however, euthanasia activists have dropped references to term inal illness, replacing them with such phrases as â€Å"hopelessly ill,† â€Å"desperately ill,† â€Å"incurably ill,† â€Å"hopeless condition,† and â€Å"meaningless life. Even doctors cannot firmly predict about the period of death and whether there is a possibility of remission with advanced treatment. Bernard Baumrin, PhD, MD, Professor of Philosophy at the City University of New York, wrote in his chapter, â€Å"Physician, Stay Thy Hand! † that appeared in the 1998 book Physician Assisted Suicide: Expanding the Debate, â€Å"Doctors must not engage in assisting suicide. They are inheritors of a valuable tradition that inspires public trust. None should be even partly responsible for the erosion of that trust.Nothing that is remotely beneficial to some particular patient in extremis is worth the damage that will be created by the perception that physicians sometimes aid and even abet people in taking their own lives. † So, implementing euthanasia would mean many unlawful deaths that could have well survived later. Along with empowering law abusers and increasing distrust of patients towards doctors, legalizing euthanasia may also lead to using as a means for health care cost containment.Perhaps one of the most important developments in recent years is the increasing emphasis placed on health care providers to contain costs. In such a climate, euthanasia certainly could become a means of cost containment. In the United States, thousands of people have no medical insurance; studies have shown that the poor and minorities generally are not given access to available pain control, and managed-care facilities are offering physicians cash bonuses if they don't provide care for patients.With greater and greater emphasis being placed on managed care, many doctors are at financial risk when they provide treatment for their patients. Legalized euthanasia raises the potential for a profoundly dangerous situation in which doc tors could find themselves far better off financially if a seriously ill or disabled person â€Å"chooses† to die rather than receive long-term care. Savings to the government may also become a consideration. This could take place if governments cut back on paying for treatment and care and replace them with the â€Å"treatment† of death.For example, immediately after the passage of Measure 16, Oregon's law permitting assisted suicide, Jean Thorne, the state's Medicaid Director, announced that physician-assisted suicide would be paid for as â€Å"comfort care† under the Oregon Health Plan which provides medical coverage for about 345,000 poor Oregonians. Within eighteen months of Measure 16's passage, the State of Oregon announced plans to cut back on health care coverage for poor state residents. In Canada, hospital stays are being shortened while, at the same time, funds have not been made available for home care for the sick and elderly.Registered nurses are being replaced with less expensive practical nurses. Patients are forced to endure long waits for many types of needed surgery. Nearly all pain can be eliminated and, in those rare cases where it can't be eliminated, it can still be reduced significantly if proper treatment is provided. It is a national and international scandal that so many people do not get adequate pain control and although voluntary euthanasia may help aleviate the pain that may come from seeing a loved one or being the one in pain, killing is not the answer to that scandal.This form of assisted suicide will not only diminish the honour and value of human life, but cause a distrust in doctors, create a rise in law abusers and a reason to allow individuals to pass in order to cut down on health care costs. The solution is to mandate better education of health care professionals on these crucial issues, to expand access to health care, and to inform patients about their rights as consumers.Everyone, whether it be a person with a life-threatening illness or a chronic condition, has the right to pain relief. With modern advances in pain control, no patient should ever be in excruciating pain. However, most doctors have never had a course in pain management so they're unaware of what to do. If a patient who is under a doctor's care is in excruciating pain, there's definitely a need to find a different doctor. But that doctor should be one who will control the pain, not one who will kill the patient. Legalization of Euthanasia ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY – EUTHANASIA By Troy Jacques Euthanasia is known as the practice of deliberately ending a life which releases an individual from an incurable disease or intolerable suffering. This mercy killing is often referred as an easy and painless death. This can be done from the request of a dying patient or that person’s legal representative. When this is done it is known as Voluntary Euthanasia. Not doing something to prevent someone’s death is known as passive or negative Euthanasia. Active or positive Euthanasia is when someone takes deliberate action to cause a death.Currently Euthanasia is not allowed by law to be practiced on people. My opinion on Euthanasia is that it should be legalised because the patients get to die in less pain and suffering as possible, the majority of the public believe that Euthanasia should be allowed morally and in a free society an individual should be able to choose their time of death. Patients with such diseases as cancer should be allowed to choose their time of death. This is because cancer is the most common cause of death in Australia, accounting for more than a quarter of all deaths.There is major pain that is associated with cancer suffers and it is a severe and intractable form of chronic pain. Patients with advanced cancers often experience multiple symptoms like fatigue, weakness, mental haziness, anxiety and nausea. Many of these symptoms can not be eliminated and any may widely affect the function of sense and well being. This can cause a major source of distress to the terminally ill and it can cause extremely unpleasant symptoms, which are undignified in the terminal stage.This is where Euthanasia would be able to step in and with the request from the patient or their legal representative put a stop to their pain and suffering. I also agree that special guidelines must be put into stop abuse from families that may profit form the death of a person. In Australia the public opinion also supports Euthanasia being legalised. It is around three quarters of the population in Australia that are in favour of doctors giving or practicing Euthanasia if requested by a terminally ill patient who is experiencing unrelievable suffering.This is based on the responses to the Morgan Poll question: â€Å" If a hopelessly ill patient, experiencing unrelievable suffering with absolutely no chance of recovery, asks for a lethal dose, so as not to wake again, should the doctor be able to give the lethal dose. In 1962 only 47% said â€Å"yes†. In 1993 78% and in 1994 and 1995 74% answered with â€Å"yes†. Now only 18% say â€Å"no† and another 8% are undecided. From this poll the people have stated that in some circumstances Voluntary Euthanasia should be allowed to be practiced.In a free society a person should be able to choose the time of their death if they are terminally ill. If we are to be truly living in a free society a person should be able to reque st their doctor to perform Voluntary Euthanasia if they are terminally ill. In not being able to request this means that we are not allowed too freely decide our own fate. I believe that Euthanasia should be legalised because if policed properly it can put a person out of intolerable suffering in which they will die in more pain anyway.At the present moment under some circumstances the public also agree that a patient should be able to request Voluntary Euthanasia to be practiced on them. It is also that a person should also be able to choose his or her own time of death if we are to be living in a fee society. If a person is allowed to legally refuse treatment that will in a consequence end their life, well why can’t a person just be put out of intolerable suffering and achieve the same fate? Word Count 650

GPS essays

GPS essays With the proliferation of satellite-based defense systems and their continuing presence in the media it makes us more aware of our national defense. The United States is large, economically strong and a sometimes tumultuous presence in the global community. Although we may feel secure because of our superior technology and defense capabilities, our size and position in world affairs can make us a target for some countries. We can no longer be concerned with just our borders and now what comes from the skies and the sea is more of a threat than ever before. The United States government had to develop a way to counter these possible attacks and the Global Positioning The Global Positioning System was initiated in 1973 by the Department of Defense (DOD). It was developed by the the DOD because at a cost of over twelve billion dollars the government had the monetary resources to achieve these idealistic goals. Since that time it has grown from one satellite used strictly by the military to twenty-six satellites that can be used by civilians also. This satellite system is used to determine the speed and position of an object anywhere in the world within one hundred meters to mere millimeters depending on the size and quality of user equipment.(GPS JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE. ICD-GPS-200:GPS INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT.) The original purpose of GPS was to maintain a strategic military advantage over our enemies. Toward the end of the arms race the targeting of ballistic missiles became so exact they could land directly on an enemy missile silo and destroy any missiles inside of it. The ability to take out your enemies missiles from great distances had a major effect on the balance of power. To maintain the balance of power the United States government had to develop a way to locate surfacing submarines in a matter of minutes anywhere in the world. Wi ...

LSAT Tricks from an Insider

LSAT Tricks from an Insider The makers of the LSAT are famously mysterious, but that doesn’t mean you can’t get inside their heads. Teaching LSAT prep classes has given me some unique insights into the how and  why of the test; the following tips- one for each section of the LSAT- should help you crack LSAC’s code on test day. LSAT Trick #1:  Memorize Argument Types Section: Logical Reasoning The vast majority of questions on the two Logical Reasoning portions of the LSAT contain a full argument: one or more premises and a conclusion. The conclusion is the thing the author is trying to prove, and the premise is some evidence that supports that conclusion. A tried and true way of scoring big on the Logical Reasoning portion is to memorize a  list of those argument types  then look for them on test day. Here’s an example of a common argument type, often referred to as excluding alternatives: There are two restaurants in this town- Roach Hut and Beef in a Cup. Beef in a Cup is closed for health code violations. Therefore, we must eat at Roach Hut. We’ve eliminated every possible alternative, so we can conclude that we must go with the only one left. Arguments like this show up on every LSAT. There are also mistakes that show up regularly in arguments, and the LSAT tests your understanding of them. Here’s an example of a flaw that some refer to as an exclusivity flaw: Imagine that, in the town referenced in the argument above, there was a third restaurant, Road Kill Bar Grill. If you made the exact same argument- excluding one restaurant- without showing that this third option was impossible, you would’ve committed an exclusivity flaw. On the test, two questions can look different on the surface- one might be about moon rocks and another about ancient history- but they may very well just be different contexts for the same type of argument. If you memorize the argument types and argument flaws before test day, you’ll be light-years ahead of the competition. LSAT Trick #2:  Use Your Game Setup More Than Once Section: Analytical Reasoning (Games)   Let’s say question #9 asks you, â€Å"If C is in slot 7, which one of the following must be true?† You dutifully create your Logic Games setup with C in 7, get the answer and move on. Guess what? You can use the work you did on question #9 on later questions. For example, another question might ask something like, â€Å"Which of the following could be true?† If there’s an answer choice that matches the setup you already made for question #9, you’ve already proven that it could be true, and so you’ve got the right answer without doing any work. If you can use your earlier work to knock out a few answer choices, you have a better chance of getting the later question right. If you can knock out all four wrong answers, then you’ve got the right answer by process of elimination. The takeaway here is don’t do more work than you have to. LSAT TRICK #3: Find the Argument Structure Section: Reading Comprehension It’s useful to think of a passage in the Reading Comprehension section as a really long (and boring) Logical Reasoning argument. Since there are generally between one and three arguments being made in any Reading Comprehension passage, and we know that an argument is made of premises and a conclusion, look for those premises and conclusions as you read. Find the structure of the argument to help you understand whats being asked.   These things are very often conclusions: A cause and effect relationship; a hypothesis; a recommendation that a course of action be taken; a prediction; an answer to a question. These things are very often premises: An experiment; a scientific study; scientific research; an example; an expert’s statement; a laundry list of items in a category. Here’s an example of something you might see on test day: The author says that smoking causes cancer. Then he talks about a study that shows that people who smoke are far more likely to get cancer than those who don’t. The cause and effect relationship is the conclusion, and the study is a premise that supports it. You’ll get tested on your understanding of how those two things relate to one another. About the Author Branden Frankel is an LSAT instructor for  Blueprint LSAT Preparation. Prior to teaching, he scored a 175 on the LSAT, got his JD from UCLA, and practiced patent law. You can find more of his insights at  Most Strongly Supported | LSAT Blog, through BluePrint LSAT Prep.   About BluePrint LSAT Preparation Blueprint students increase their LSAT score by an average of 11 points on in-class practice tests, and can enroll in live  LSAT prep classes throughout the country or  take an online LSAT course from home.